Theyre not pleasant. msn back to msn home news Skip To Navigation But it may not take a lawsuit for the issue to change the environment when it comes to mandatory vaccination. Similar to the Navy, the Marine Corps is no longer stopping unvaccinated Marines from deployments. WASHINGTON (AP) The military services are still reviewing possible discipline of troops who refused the order to get the COVID-19 vaccine, defense officials told Congress on Tuesday, and they provided few details on how many of those who were forced out of the military would like to return. Then in April, the WHO warned that. However, vaccine opponents note that commanders can still make decisions on how and whether to deploy unvaccinated troops, under a memo signed last month by Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin. On Feb. 17, the service lifted its policy of banning unvaccinated sailors from deploying. Biden appointee behind unlawful military vaccine mandate to step down. There are some notable caveats. They will also have to make the case that vaccinating, or involuntarily discharging, every service member is the least restrictive means of keeping the force safe from COVID-19, rather than enforcing masking or social distancing or in some cases, grandfathering in troops who acquired some immunity after catching COVID-19. Still, the organization said Covaxin is still a safe and effective product. Jared Serbu: Yeah, theres a ton. When I meet my maker, Im going to be held responsible for the decisions Ive made, and Id much rather go to prison, Stapanon testified in March. And then if you come back and you say, oh, no, but my exemption is a medical exemption [see Contraindications and Precautions]not a religious exemption, then the military says, Oh, well, in that case, we welcome you with open arms. Given the prevailing public health guidelines and the state of the virus, there is currently no intention to require universal vaccination of all service members, Ross said. The fetal cells were not used to produce either vaccine, National Geographic reported last fall. And in some cases, according to some reports, its even more durable than the vaccine and you dont have to get boosters and things like that. So for example, in a different context, somebody who says that theyre a Sabbath observer, and they cannot work on the Sabbath, but that theyre willing to trade ships with somebody, most of the cases Ive seen, theyre actually willing to take, what most people consider be a less favorable shift. On Jan. 10, the DOD officially rescinded its Aug. 24, 2021, and Nov. 30, 2021, memoranda mandating that all members of the U.S. military, including the National Guard and Ready Reserves, take the emergency use authorization COVID-19 shots or face discharge and other disciplinary measures. The story seems pretty similar to whats going on with these airmen. When you treat people who have a medical exemption for more favorably than you treat somebody who has a religious exemption, that is textbook discrimination, and thats whats happening. The question is, whats the bigger risk to readiness: Discharging skilled, expensively trained service members for refusing to get vaccinated, or allowing them to continue serving with the potential to become infected with COVID-19, experience serious illness and potentially long-lasting side effects? So everywhere else in society has been able to figure this out, but our military hasnt because they take such an iron fisted, draconian approach to everything. In fact, as of Dec. 17, the religious accommodation requests of at least 29 of the 35 naval plaintiffs had been flatly denied. Best listening experience is on Chrome, Firefox or Safari. (The Daily Signal is the news outlet of The Heritage Foundation.). Unlike VARES that is questioned a lot by the totally compromised medical establishment for accuracy, the U.S. military DMED (Defense Medical Epidemiology Database) reporting system is only submitted by military doctors and qualifies every single ICD (International Classification of Diseases) code in the military for Tricare billing to Humana Insurance covering over 6 million military personal. The Catholic Churchs policy on derived fetal cells has been clear for decades: the sin of abortion is so far removed in pharmaceutical development that a Catholic is not violating any principles by getting vaccinated. Read all Military Times coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic here, Tens of thousands of part-time soldiers face discharge for missing COVID vax deadline, Federal judge shields another unvaccinated airman from punishment, New vaccine may be option for troops with religious concerns, Bids to weaken military COVID vaccine mandate stall in Congress, Veterans Affairs drops mask requirement for all agency medical offices, Officials OK some hand and neck tattoos for airmen, Guardians, Perennial pilot shortage puts Air Force in precarious position, Healthy eating on a budget for busy military spouses, The impossible choice facing many of Americas military families, Tax scams How to report them Money Minute, Capitol Hill weighs action on two controversial topics: medical marijuana and abortion, Lockheed wins hypersonics contract | Defense Dollars, Go inside a secret nuclear fallout bunker sealed for decades, Another Air Force fleet grounded over fears plane tails may fall off, Pentagon orders engine vibration fix for entire F-35 fleet worldwide, Minot firings due to failed nuclear safety inspection, Air Force advisers study use of satellites for tracking moving targets. OConnormade note of thisin his order, calling the process for seeking a religious exemption nothing more than theater, stating that the Navy merely rubber-stamps each denial, and stressing that the record overwhelmingly demonstrates that the Navys religious-accommodation process is an exercise in futility.. All the things that, you know, that the Navy was doing to harass and punish sailors we basically wanted that to all stop, Mike Berry, a former Marine judge advocate and now vice president at First Liberty Institute, which represents the Texas plaintiffs, told Military Times on Wednesday. It is a danger of, you know, the government saying, Well, hey, heres what your faith tradition teaches, you should follow that, " Griffin said. Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine was developed and cleared for emergency use in eight months a fact . Follow him on Twitter @TomNovelly. The government responded to the lawsuit by pointing out that immunization requirements are common in the military beginning with the Continental Army under George Washington and that vaccines and are essential to preventing the transmission of diseases in close quarters. Sixty-seven percent of the U.S. population is fully vaccinated. And I havent heard of a single Starbucks shutting down. And our clients are, theyre stationed in various locations, quite a few of them are here in Texas. And they recognize that theres almost a presumption of belief. This whole thing is really unprecedented, right? There was no indication when the judges would rule. There is no verifiable evidence that COVID-19 vaccines have killed, or will kill, more military personnel than the disease itself. The government really cant scrutinize belief very far.. But if they eventually get consolidated in the Supreme Court grants cert [writs of certiorari] on something that considers the issue more broadly, would you expect that well get a case or a ruling that goes beyond the narrow issue of vaccines and gives the military some guidance as to how RFRA and broader religious accommodation issues apply to the military? You got a preliminary injunction in that case and a favorable ruling from the Fifth Circuit. While it allowed service members to apply for religious exemptions to the mandate, it has not granted a single one. 11. A 5th Circuit panel rejected the Biden administrations request to block the judges order. The group includes 14 men and two women. But the DoD is just saying Nope, we wont even recognize that we wont even consider it, even though they consider natural immunity for other communicable diseases and infections and things like that. Quite the contrary, they view life whether their own or that of their fellow servicemembers as sacred and deserving protection.. The Justice Department intends to appeal the Texas ruling, while a temporary injunction in the Florida case expires Friday. Researchers cultivate these cells for generations, using their derivatives to create or test all manner of pharmaceutical products. The service branches must notify the Pentagon that they've made the changes no later than March 17. I know, off the top of my head, the number in the Navy is somewhere near 4,100. Top Pentagon officials do not plan to alter their current "lawful orders" requiring the coronavirus shots for troops, unless they are granted waivers for medical or religious purposes, the. And youll see headline after headline talking about the recruiting and retention woes that plague our military right now. The judge agreed, issuing an injunction against discipline for the sailors on Jan. 3. The Navy service members in this case seek to vindicate the very freedoms they have sacrificed so much to protect,OConnor wrote, adding: The COVID-19 pandemic provides the government no license to abrogate those freedoms. As part of the exemption process, service members are required to meet with a chaplain to work through their concerns. WASHINGTON The Air Force has discharged 27 people for refusing to get the COVID-19 vaccine, making them what officials believe are the first service members to be removed for disobeying the. The Heritage Foundation, a petitioner in the case challenging the private-sector vaccine mandate,has asked the courtto invalidate the governments order. Another difference is that the VICP is a no-fault compensation program. . Most of the plaintiffs express some sort of Christian faith, though the vast majority of denominations have no formal ban on vaccination. A federal court in Ohio on Thursday blocked the Air Force from enforcing the militarys coronavirus vaccine mandate for two weeks, a short-term win for airmen fighting multiple legal battles against inoculation. The law says that sincerely held religious beliefs are to be taken at face value. Court documents show that two plaintiffs in Doster v. Kendall took the two-dose Covaxin vaccine, created in India, to comply with the Pentagons requirement. And theyre discriminating against people in the military. Starbucks, for example, doesnt have a vaccine requirement. Army leadership has been eyeing the possibility of a mandated COVID-19 vaccine this summer, including in a June information paper originating from the Army's health care operations directorate . Plaintiffs, therefore, do not object to safety measures that reduce the transmission of COVID-19 in the workplace, it reads. Lawmakers expressed frustration with the news . Complainants push back on the militarys position that remaining unvaccinated endangers the force and undermines national security, since the vast majority of troops have received all of a one- or two-shot regimen. The problem here is that the government is simply unwilling to offer any compromises. More than 60 service members have joined lawsuits against the U.S. government, alleging that the military's process for awarding religious vaccine exemptions is a sham. AFLDS has also pushed ivermectin and. So our lawsuit is really predicated on on the argument that this is all a sham, that the Air Force is not following the Constitution. I mean, this is quickly becoming a national security issue for our nation. Theyre burdensome, but the person says, But you know what, at the end of the day, Im not have to inject something in my body that violates my religious beliefs. Another plaintiff is fighting in court after trying to retire one alternative to vaccination the Air Force offered. They argue that their 1st Amendment rights are being infringed upon, because their sincerely held religious beliefs prevent them from receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Dr Terry Adirim, the government bureaucrat behind the infamous and unlawful Pentagon vaccine mandate, will "leave her post in the coming days," reports FedScoop. More than 1.14 million out of the 1.4 million active military members have been fully vaccinated as of Wednesday, according to DoD data. That leaves around 14,400 airmen and guardians less protected in the COVID-19 pandemics third year. The service members who filed the lawsuit represent more than 350 collective years of military service, and more than 100 combat deployments. And one of the reasons for that is if they if theyre between the ages of 17 and 23, and theyre not vaccinated, were not even willing to talk to them. And so theyre basically closing off an entire segment of society in a discriminatory manner. ", -- Konstantin Toropin contributed to this report. Well, what if somebodys not really sincere? Each week, Defense Reporter Jared Serbu speaks with the managers of the federal government's largest department. And in one instance, I saw one of the head people for recruiting in the military said, Were having a really hard time identifying, basically people who are eligible to serve in the military. The Supreme Court is reviewing a legal shield that tech companies have long relied on to avoid liability for content on their platforms. There is no COVID-19 exception to the First Amendment. But in terms of the underlying legal issues that are raised, no, theyre exactly the same. The policy does allow commanders to "implement Health Protection Measures at any time or manner deemed necessary in support of operational safety and effectiveness." Hubbard Radio Washington DC, LLC. While it allowed service members to apply for religious exemptions to the mandate, it has not granted a single one. And they have different ranks, different different job responsibilities in the Air Force, a number of them are actually pilots in the Air Force. (Susan Walsh/AP, File). And that is textbook discrimination, right? Jared Serbu: Last thing, theres a lot of these vaccine cases, even just military vaccine cases floating around in various district courts and circuits the moment. "Former Soldiers may petition the Army Discharge Review Board and the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to request corrections to their records," the service's press release said. The first lawsuit to garner national attention, filed in Texas late last year, made a splash because its plaintiffs include SEALs, among the most elite of the militarys special operations forces. Several lawsuits have been filed by sailors opposing the mandate and challenging the Navy's approach to reviewing the religious exemption requests. The complaint also brings up the issue of Food and Drug Administration licensure. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area. More than 8,400 troops were forced out of the military for refusing to obey a lawful order when they declined to get the vaccine. While powerful, that statement isnt true. Im happy to take that one from you. Jared Serbu: Mike, thanks for being here. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. condemned the mid-morning attack. The free exercise of religion, even in the military, it triggers the strongest protection available in the law.. Mike Barry: I think theres almost 30 now. The lawsuit also fails to mention an established precedent regarding vaccines in religious traditions. Other service members have struck out on their own to fight the mandate. Technology Artificial Intelligence Ask the CIO Automation Big Data CIO News Cloud Computing Cybersecurity IT Modernization Open Data/Transparency Reporter's Notebook Defense On DoD Army Navy Air Force Pfizer and Modernas mRNA products used cells replicated from a fetus aborted in the 1970s to make sure the vaccines worked in human cells. A federal judge in Cincinnati has expanded a temporary exemption to a Department of Defense COVID-19 vaccine mandate to cover thousands of service members in the U.S. Air Force and Space Force,. The primary protest centers around fetal stem cells, which may or may not have originated with an aborted pregnancy. Rachel Cohen joined Air Force Times as senior reporter in March 2021. 2:14:14 Pentagon exploring back pay for troops kicked out of military over vaccine mandate. And so all of them have requested religious accommodations from the vaccine mandate, which is, of course, something that DoD regulations and even federal law, clearly permit and allow. And I have yet to hear of a single flight being canceled because there was a COVID outbreak at 30,000 feet. Also missing from the lawsuits are any new religious conversion, or simply the possibility that they were previously unaware of the role of replicated fetal stem cells in pharmaceutical development, that would explain why they never objected to any vaccines or medications before. The government burdens religion when it put[s] substantial pressure on an adherent to modify his behavior and to violate his beliefs.. It was just a bunch of window dressing, on what was really a foregone conclusion of 100% of religious exemption requests were going to be disapproved, Berry said. A federal judge granted a preliminary injunction on Monday blocking the Defense Department from taking action against a group of 35 Navy sailors who had refused to get a coronavirus vaccine,. While in Texas, the sailors offered descriptions of their jobs, in Florida, the biographical information goes into training, deployments and expertise, attempting to make the case that their involuntary discharges would be a huge loss. That means that this is quickly becoming a national security concern. Editors note: This story has been updated with information from the hearing. The U.S . The latest data from the military show that roughly 30,000 active-duty service members remain unvaccinated against COVID-19, despite a Defense Department mandate issued in August and deadlines. And now people will be able to take the analysis Supreme Court used and say, Okay, the way that they analyzed this issue, that might give us some indication of how they would analyze other issues, right. The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), it doesnt, the sincerity issue is what everybody seems to be concerned with, right? The Supreme Court ruled in March 2022 that the sea service was allowed to reassign sailors who had refused the shot and filed exemption requests to nonoperational commands. The judge's decision impacts 200 to 300 servicemembers stationed at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, who filed the lawsuit against top military leaders back in February. OConnor ruled that the blanket denial of their religious waiver requests amounted to a violation of the service members rights under the First Amendment andthe Religious Freedom Restoration Act. WASHINGTON (AP) A bill to rescind the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for members of the U.S. military and provide nearly $858 billion for national defense passed the House on Thursday as. All rights reserved. Religious freedom laws are set up to avoid a circumstance where the Navy, or the military or the government, is doing a faith test, to determine whether or not you really believe what youre supposed to believe, Griffin said. And thats why this is a sham.Jared Serbu: The Air Force case is a putative class action. US Military To Face COVID-19 Vaccine Lawsuit February 18, 2023. Federal News Network's DoD Cloud Exchange: From enterprise to the tactical edge discover how the Defense Department and military services intend to advance their use of cloud technologies. All told the lawsuit includes 26 SEALs from the original complaint, plus five special warfare combatant crewmen, five divers and one explosive ordnance disposal technician who joined the case in late January. The Navy on Wednesday announced it had granted one waiver to a member of the Individual Ready Reserve, a non-drilling service member, who would have to get vaccinated should he or she come on orders. Pope Francis has called vaccination against COVID-19 a moral obligation and an act of love., Frequently people let themselves be influenced by the ideology of the moment, often bolstered by baseless information or poorly documented facts, he said in January, adding that vaccines are not a magical means of healing, yet surely they represent, in addition to other treatments that need to be developed, the most reasonable solution for the prevention of the disease.. He spoke with a reporter last Wednesday but did . Right? Law firms Latham & Watkins LLP Follow Siri & Glimstad LLP (Reuters) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, facing a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking a vast trove of data. While vials contain the same formula, some have made the argument that because providers are still giving the emergency-use Pfizer version, no one can be compelled to get vaccinated until the Comirnaty-labeled vials are in circulation.
